NUTRITION

A Comprehensive Technical Analysis of Dietary Patterns,

Metabolic Pathways, and Nutritional Science

Evidence Grading:  A = Strong RCT  |  B = Moderate  |  C = Preliminary  |  D = Theoretical

Nutrition remains the single most impactful modifiable variable in human health and longevity, yet nutritional science has long been compromised by reductive models that obscure biological complexity. The dominant paradigm—calories in, calories out (CICO)—treats the human body as a simple thermodynamic engine, ignoring the profound metabolic, hormonal, microbiological, and epigenetic consequences of food composition. This chapter systematically dismantles the CICO framework and replaces it with an evidence-based understanding of how food quality, bioavailability, nutrient density, and metabolic context determine health outcomes [1,2,3].

Five major dietary patterns are analysed at molecular and systemic levels: vegan, vegetarian, Mediterranean, carnivore, and ketogenic diets. Each is evaluated across metabolic pathways, gut microbiome effects, energy conversion efficiency, digestive hormone signalling, and long-term health trajectories. No single diet emerges as universally optimal—outcomes depend on individual metabolic phenotype, gut ecology, genetic polymorphisms (folate metabolism, fatty acid desaturation, detoxification enzymes), and adherence quality [4,5,6].

Three critical nutritional parameters supersede caloric accounting: bioavailability (the fraction of ingested nutrients actually absorbed and utilised), nutrient density (essential micronutrient concentration relative to caloric load), and nutrient quality (metabolic utility and molecular integrity of food constituents). Industrial food processing systematically degrades all three while increasing caloric density [7,8].

Processed foods, industrial seed oils high in linoleic acid, and partially hydrogenated fats are identified as primary drivers of chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease. The oxidative instability of polyunsaturated fatty acids in refined seed oils creates aldehydes and lipid peroxides damaging endothelial function and promoting atherogenesis [9,10,11].

The supplementation landscape is evaluated from omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin D to collagen, adaptogens, and nootropic stacks—identifying evidence-supported interventions while exposing marketing-driven proliferation of poorly studied compounds [12,13].

I. THE FAILURE OF THE CICO MODEL: WHY CALORIES ARE NOT ALL EQUAL

1.1 The Thermodynamic Premise and Its Limitations

The calories-in, calories-out model derives from Newtonian thermodynamics: energy is conserved, and body weight change equals the difference between energy intake and expenditure. In a closed calorimeter this holds precisely. In a biological system, however, the model commits a category error by treating metabolic complexity as thermodynamic simplicity. The human body is not a heat engine operating at fixed efficiency. Metabolic rate is regulated by a sophisticated neuroendocrine system responsive to diet composition, meal timing, hormonal milieu, gut microbiome, ambient temperature, sleep, and psychological stress [14,15,16].

Two individuals consuming identical caloric intakes will partition that energy radically differently depending on insulin sensitivity, leptin signalling, thyroid function, gut bacterial composition, and genetic metabolic phenotype. Twin studies demonstrate heritable metabolic rate variation of 20-40%, meaning genetically identical individuals may require 400-800 kcal/day difference in intake to maintain equivalent body composition [17,18].

1.2 Thermic Effect of Food: Macronutrient-Dependent Metabolic Cost

The thermic effect of food (TEF) describes the metabolic energy cost of digesting, absorbing, and processing nutrients. TEF varies dramatically by macronutrient: protein requires 20-30% of its caloric value for processing (gluconeogenesis precursor conversion, amino acid transamination, urea cycle operation), carbohydrates require 5-10% (phosphorylation, glycogen synthesis), and fats require only 0-3% (minimal processing cost given direct chylomicron incorporation) [19,20,21].

A 2,000 kcal diet at 40% protein, 40% carbohydrate, 20% fat expends approximately 240-320 kcal on TEF. The identical caloric intake at 10% protein, 60% carbohydrate, 30% fat expends only 130-180 kcal on TEF. This 100-140 kcal differential—invisible to caloric counting—represents meaningful metabolic difference over weeks and months [22,23].

1.3 Insulin and Metabolic Partitioning

Insulin remains the master metabolic partitioning hormone. Its secretion is driven primarily by blood glucose concentration and gut-derived incretin hormones (GLP-1, GIP), not total caloric load. Two foods delivering identical calories but different glycaemic profiles produce fundamentally different hormonal environments. High-glycaemic carbohydrates provoke rapid insulin spikes promoting hepatic lipogenesis, adipose triglyceride storage, and suppression of fatty acid oxidation—regardless of total caloric intake [24,25,26].

This mechanism explains why low-carbohydrate diets consistently produce superior short-term weight loss even when caloric intake is not formally restricted: insulin suppression shifts metabolic partitioning from fat storage toward fat oxidation. The CICO model cannot account for this without incorporating hormonal mediators, at which point it ceases to be a simple input-output calculation [27,28].

1.4 Adaptive Thermogenesis and Metabolic Adaptation

Prolonged caloric restriction activates adaptive thermogenesis: reduced T3 production, decreased sympathetic nervous system activity, and increased metabolic efficiency of skeletal muscle. Individuals who lose weight through caloric restriction exhibit metabolically adapted states persisting years afterward, with resting metabolic rates 300-400 kcal/day below weight-matched individuals who never lost weight—documented in the Minnesota Starvation Experiment and subsequent Biggest Loser studies [29,30,31,32].

1.5 Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT)

NEAT accounts for 15-30% of total daily energy expenditure and ranges 200-2,000 kcal/day between individuals. Overfeeding studies demonstrate dramatic NEAT compensation variation: some individuals increase NEAT by 400+ kcal/day during overfeeding, dissipating surplus as movement and fidgeting, while others show minimal NEAT response and store the surplus as fat. This genetically determined variation is influenced by leptin sensitivity and sympathetic nervous system reactivity [33,34].

Map: Overall Obesity

In 2024, at least 1 in 4 adults in all U.S. states and territories had obesity.

The CDC 2024 Adult Obesity Prevalence Maps for 49 states, the District of Columbia, and three U.S. territories show the proportion of adults with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 based on self-reported weight and height. Data are presented by location, age, race and ethnicity, and education level. 

There are notable differences by individual characteristics, including by location, age, education level, and race, and ethnicity.

In 2024, all U.S. states and territories had an obesity prevalence of 25% or higher (at least 1 in 4 adults). Overall, the Midwest (35.9%) and South (34.5%) had the highest prevalence of obesity, followed by the West (30.2%) and the Northeast (30.3%).

 

Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

II. BIOAVAILABILITY, NUTRIENT DENSITY, AND NUTRIENT QUALITY

2.1 Bioavailability: From Plate to Plasma

Bioavailability defines the proportion of an ingested nutrient reaching systemic circulation in metabolically active form. It is determined by absorption kinetics, first-pass hepatic metabolism, and enterocyte transport capacity. Bioavailability varies enormously depending on the chemical form of the nutrient, the food matrix, co-ingested compounds, and the individual's gut microbiome and enzymatic repertoire [35,36,37].

Iron exemplifies this complexity. Haem iron (animal red meat, organ meats) absorbs at 15-35% efficiency via dedicated DMT-1/ferroportin transporters, largely independent of gastric pH. Non-haem iron (plant sources) absorbs at only 2-20%, profoundly inhibited by phytates, tannins, and calcium, and requires reduction from Fe3+ to Fe2+ by duodenal cytochrome b reductase—a process dependent on ascorbic acid. This 5-15 fold bioavailability differential means a plant-based meal must deliver 5-15 times the listed iron content to achieve equivalent absorption to an animal-based source [38,39,40].

Vitamin B12 demonstrates another dimension: cyanocobalamin (most common supplement form) must be converted to methylcobalamin or adenosylcobalamin by hepatic methyltransferases before metabolic activity. Individuals with impaired intrinsic factor production—common in atrophic gastritis, increasingly prevalent with age—cannot absorb any oral B12 efficiently, requiring intramuscular supplementation [41,42].

Omega-3 fatty acids present a critical bioavailability issue for plant-based diets. Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), the only plant omega-3, must undergo elongation and desaturation to form EPA and DHA—operating at only 1-5% efficiency in humans due to enzyme saturation and competition with linoleic acid for delta-6 desaturase [43,44,45].

Table 1 — Bioavailability of Key Micronutrients

Absorption efficiency across animal and plant sources, with critical modifying factors that determine effective nutrient delivery.
Nutrient Animal Source Plant Source Key Modifiers
Iron Haem: 15–35% Non-haem: 2–20% Phytates & tannins inhibit; ascorbic acid enhances up to 6×
Zinc 25–40% 10–15% Phytates & fibre inhibit; fermentation & sprouting reduce phytate 50–70%
Vitamin B12 70–90%
(active forms direct)
Absent Intrinsic factor essential; atrophic gastritis blocks absorption entirely
Calcium 25–35%
(dairy)
10–30%
(variable)
Oxalates block absorption (spinach, rhubarb); vitamin D status critical
Omega-3
(EPA / DHA)
80–90%
(fish oil)
ALA only
1–5% conversion
ALA → EPA/DHA limited by delta-6 desaturase; linoleic acid competes for same enzyme
Folate N/A 10–60%
(matrix-dependent)
MTHFR polymorphism critical — affects ∼40% of population; impairs folate activation

Table 1: Bioavailability of key micronutrients across food sources with modifying factors.

2.2 Nutrient Density

Nutrient density quantifies essential micronutrient concentration per unit of caloric load. Organ meats (liver, heart, kidney) rank among the most nutrient-dense foods identified—100g beef liver delivers vitamin A (2,500+ mcg RAE), B12 (70+ mcg), riboflavin (3+ mg), folate, copper, and iron exceeding daily requirements simultaneously [46,47,48].

Refined grain products deliver 70-100 kcal per 30g serving with minimal micronutrient accompaniment. Industrial fortification restores a fraction of what milling removed, often in poorly bioavailable synthetic forms. The nutrient density gap between whole and refined foods represents a fundamental failing of the modern diet [49,50].

2.3 Nutrient Quality: Molecular Integrity

Nutrient quality encompasses metabolic utility invisible to nutrient analysis. Leucine content determines muscle protein synthesis via mTORC1 activation—a threshold of 2.5-3.5g per meal is required for maximal anabolic response. Animal proteins typically deliver this threshold in standard servings; plant proteins, due to lower digestibility correction factors (DIAAS scores), often fail to do so [51,52,53].

Fatty acid quality extends beyond omega-3/omega-6 ratios to include oxidative stability. Short-chain plant omega-3s (ALA) cannot substitute for long-chain marine omega-3s (EPA, DHA) due to the 1-5% conversion efficiency limitation. Food processing degrades nutrient quality through thermal degradation of heat-labile vitamins, Maillard reaction AGE formation, and PUFA oxidation [54,55].

III. METABOLIC RESPONSES TO DIETARY MACRONUTRIENTS

3.1 Carbohydrate Metabolism

Dietary carbohydrates are hydrolysed to monosaccharides (glucose, fructose, galactose) by amylase and brush border enzymes. Glucose is absorbed via SGLT1, enters portal blood, and reaches the liver where it faces three fates: glycogen synthesis (insulin-stimulated, capacity ~500g), oxidation via glycolysis and TCA cycle, or de novo lipogenesis (DNL) when glycogen stores are saturated [56,57,58].

Fructose represents a metabolically distinct sugar: absorbed via GLUT5, it enters hepatocytes via GLUT2 independent of insulin. Fructose bypasses phosphofructokinase (PFK)—the rate-limiting glycolytic step—entering at the fructokinase step, which is unregulated and insulin-independent. This drives de novo lipogenesis at maximal enzymatic velocity regardless of energy status, producing hepatic steatosis, triglyceride synthesis, and hyperlipidaemia through mechanisms distinct from glucose [59,60,61].

3.2 Fat Metabolism

Dietary triglycerides are emulsified by bile salts, hydrolysed by pancreatic lipase into 2-monoacylglycerols and free fatty acids, absorbed by enterocytes, re-esterified, and packaged into chylomicrons. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) in capillary beds hydrolyses chylomicron triglycerides—adipose LPL is insulin-stimulated (promoting storage), muscle LPL is exercise-stimulated (promoting oxidation) [64,65].

During carbohydrate restriction, hepatic fatty acid oxidation generates acetyl-CoA exceeding TCA cycle capacity. Excess acetyl-CoA is diverted to ketogenesis via HMG-CoA synthase and lyase, producing acetoacetate and beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB). Ketone bodies supply up to 60-70% of cerebral energy during prolonged fasting, substantially reducing glucose dependence and preserving muscle protein from gluconeogenic catabolism [66,67,68].

3.3 Protein Metabolism

Dietary proteins are hydrolysed by pepsin and pancreatic proteases into peptides and amino acids, absorbed via PepT1 and amino acid transporters. Amino acids reaching the liver are partitioned among hepatic protein synthesis, transamination, gluconeogenesis (from alanine, glutamine, glycine, serine), or release for peripheral uptake. Skeletal muscle protein synthesis is regulated primarily by mTORC1, activated by leucine, insulin, and mechanical stimulus. Meals must deliver 2.5-3.5g leucine to maximally stimulate mTORC1 [69,70,71,72,73].

IV. GUT MICROBIOME AND DIETARY PATTERNS

Diagram of the digestive system-VOID

4.1 Microbiome Composition and Dietary Influence

The human gut harbours approximately 3.8 x 10^13 microbial cells—roughly equal to human cell count—across 1,000+ species whose collective genome (metagenome) encodes metabolic capabilities exceeding those of the entire human genome. This microbial ecosystem functions as an extended metabolic organ, performing functions including dietary fibre fermentation to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acid biotransformation, tryptophan metabolism to serotonin precursors and indole derivatives, vitamin synthesis (K2, B12, some B vitamins), and immune system modulation [74,75,76].

Dietary pattern exerts the most powerful influence on microbiome composition—more than age, geography, or medication use in most studies. High-fibre diets (particularly varied plant-based diets) increase Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Roseburia—genera associated with SCFA production and intestinal barrier integrity. High-protein, high-fat diets shift composition toward Bacteroides, Prevotella, and proteolytic species, with corresponding increases in hydrogen sulphide and branched-chain fatty acid production [77,78,79].

4.2 Short-Chain Fatty Acids: The Microbial Metabolite Highway

Colonic bacteria ferment dietary fibre (resistant starch, cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, inulin) producing SCFAs—primarily acetate (60%), propionate (25%), and butyrate (15%). These are not waste products but critical metabolic fuels and signalling molecules [80,81,82].

Butyrate serves as the primary energy source for colonocytes (providing 60-70% of their ATP), maintains intestinal barrier integrity by upregulating tight junction proteins (claudin-3, occludin, ZO-1), inhibits NF-kappaB activation reducing colonic inflammation, activates PPARgamma in colonocytes promoting anti-inflammatory gene expression, and acts as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with epigenetic effects on cancer suppressor gene expression. Propionate is a gluconeogenic substrate and cholesterol synthesis inhibitor. Acetate serves as a peripheral acetyl-CoA source and appetite-regulating signal [83,84,85].

Insufficient fibre intake—characteristic of Western diets and high-animal-protein diets—reduces SCFA production, impairs barrier function, promotes intestinal inflammation, and shifts the microbiome toward proteolytic species producing toxic metabolites (hydrogen sulphide, secondary bile acids, p-cresol). This microbiome degradation contributes to metabolic endotoxaemia—leakage of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria through a compromised gut barrier into systemic circulation, driving chronic low-grade inflammation [86,87].

4.3 Bile Acid Metabolism and Enterohepatic Circulation

Bile acids are synthesised from cholesterol in the liver, conjugated with glycine or taurine, secreted into the duodenum for fat emulsification, and reabsorbed in the terminal ileum via the FXR-SHP axis for recycling. Gut bacteria transform primary bile acids (cholate, chenodeoxycholate) into secondary bile acids (deoxycholate, lithocholate) through deconjugation and 7-alpha dehydroxylation. Secondary bile acids act as FXR and TGR5 ligands regulating cholesterol homeostasis, energy expenditure, and glucose metabolism. Dysbiotic alteration of bile acid profiles is increasingly implicated in metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and hepatic steatosis [88,89].

V. DIGESTIVE HORMONES AND SATIETY SIGNALLING

5.1 The Enteroendocrine System

The gastrointestinal tract contains over 12 distinct enteroendocrine cell types secreting 20+ hormones regulating appetite, gastric motility, pancreatic secretion, bile release, and systemic metabolism. These form an integrated signalling network coordinating nutrient sensing with metabolic response, ensuring that energy intake is matched to energy expenditure through multiple redundant feedback mechanisms [90,91,92].

5.2 GLP-1: The Satiety and Glucose-Regulating Hormone

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1, 7-37) is secreted by L cells in the distal gut in response to nutrient contact—particularly fatty acids (via GPR41/43), glucose (via SGLT1), and bile acids (via TGR5). GLP-1 acts on pancreatic beta cells stimulating glucose-dependent insulin secretion (the incretin effect, responsible for 50-70% of postprandial insulin response), inhibits glucagon secretion from alpha cells, slows gastric emptying increasing satiety duration, acts centrally on hypothalamic GLP-1 receptors reducing appetite, and in animal models promotes pancreatic beta cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis [93,94,95].

GLP-1 is rapidly degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) with a half-life of 2-3 minutes. This rapid turnover means GLP-1 signalling is intensely nutrient-contact-dependent—meal composition profoundly affects GLP-1 kinetics. Meals rich in long-chain fatty acids and fermentable fibre (which reaches the distal gut stimulating L cells directly and via microbial SCFA production) produce more sustained GLP-1 responses than refined carbohydrate meals [96,97].

5.3 PYY, CCK, and Ghrelin: The Appetite Triad

Peptide YY (PYY 3-36) is co-secreted with GLP-1 from L cells, acts on hypothalamic Y2 receptors reducing food intake, and contributes 10-20% of meal-induced satiety. Cholecystokinin (CCK) is released from I cells in the duodenum in response to fatty acids and amino acids, stimulates pancreatic enzyme secretion, contracts the gallbladder, and signals satiety via vagal afferents acting on brainstem satiety centres. Together, GLP-1, PYY, and CCK form a complementary satiety cascade requiring fat and protein contact with gut epithelium for activation—refined carbohydrate meals that bypass these triggers produce minimal satiety signalling despite high caloric content [98,99,100].

Ghrelin, secreted primarily from P/D1 cells in the gastric fundus, is the primary orexigenic (appetite-stimulating) hormone, signalling through growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) in the hypothalamus. Ghrelin rises before meals and falls postprandially—but critically, ghrelin suppression requires direct stomach distension and nutrient absorption, not merely caloric intake. Liquid meals and rapidly absorbed nutrients produce impaired ghrelin suppression compared to solid meals requiring extended gastric residence, explaining why liquid caloric sources (smoothies, shakes, sugary beverages) fail to satisfy appetite despite caloric equivalence to solid food [101,102].

5.4 Leptin and Insulin: Long-Term Energy Homeostasis

Leptin, secreted by adipocytes in proportion to fat mass, signals long-term energy status to the hypothalamus via JAK-STAT pathway, suppressing appetite and increasing energy expenditure. Insulin signals acute nutritional status centrally, also suppressing appetite. In obesity, both hormones develop resistance—leptin resistance (impaired transport across blood-brain barrier, reduced receptor sensitivity) and insulin resistance reduce the effectiveness of satiety signalling, creating a state where the brain perceives starvation despite abundant energy stores. Diet composition influences leptin and insulin sensitivity: Mediterranean-pattern diets improve both, while high-fructose and high-trans-fat diets worsen both [103,104,105].

VI. DIET-BY-DIET TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

6.1 The Vegan Diet

A well-planned vegan diet provides adequate macronutrient intake but presents significant micronutrient challenges requiring systematic attention. Critical deficiency risks include: vitamin B12 (complete absence from plant sources—supplementation mandatory), vitamin D3 (plants contain D2, which has 10-40% lower biological potency than D3), long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (ALA-to-EPA/DHA conversion at 1-5% inadequate for physiological demands), haem iron and zinc (lower bioavailability from plant matrices), calcium (lower absorption from oxalate-rich greens), and iodine (variable and unreliable in plant foods absent sea vegetables) [106,107,108].

Protein quality requires careful planning. Plant proteins generally have DIAAS scores of 0.6-0.85 compared to 0.9-1.0 for animal proteins, meaning 15-40% more total protein intake is required to achieve equivalent amino acid delivery. Complementary protein combinations (legume+grain) improve essential amino acid profiles but do not eliminate the leucine threshold issue—achieving 2.5-3.5g leucine per meal from plant sources typically requires 40-60g total plant protein per meal [109,110,111].

Gut microbiome effects are generally positive: high fibre intake promotes SCFA-producing taxa, barrier integrity, and microbial diversity. However, anti-nutritional factors in plant foods—phytates, lectins, tannins, saponins—can impair mineral absorption and, in sensitive individuals, provoke intestinal inflammation. Fermentation, sprouting, and soaking substantially reduce these compounds [112,113].

Long-term vegan cohort studies (Adventist Health Study, EPIC study) show lower rates of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, certain cancers, and overall mortality compared to omnivorous populations—but confounding variables (health-conscious lifestyle, lower smoking rates, lower BMI) make causal attribution difficult. Evidence grade: B for cardiovascular benefit, C for all-cause mortality [114,115].

6.2 The Vegetarian Diet

Lacto-ovo vegetarian diets substantially mitigate the nutrient gaps of vegan diets: dairy and eggs provide bioavailable B12, vitamin D3, calcium, complete protein, and haem-independent iron sources. Omega-3 DHA/EPA remains deficient unless fatty fish, algae supplements, or DHA-enriched eggs are included. Protein quality is intermediate—dairy protein and egg protein have DIAAS scores of 1.0 and 0.97 respectively, providing excellent amino acid profiles [116,117].

The primary remaining concerns are iron status (non-haem iron only, with persistent bioavailability limitations) and potentially iodine. Vegetarian diets maintain the fibre advantage of plant-based eating while adding animal-derived micronutrient density. Population studies consistently show lower cardiovascular disease rates than omnivores, with evidence grade B for metabolic health benefits [118,119].

6.3 The Mediterranean Diet

The Mediterranean dietary pattern consistently demonstrates the strongest evidence base for longevity and disease prevention of any dietary pattern studied—evidence grade A from the PREDIMED trial (randomised, controlled, 7,447 participants showing 30% reduction in cardiovascular events with olive oil supplementation) and multiple large cohort studies [120,121,122].

Key metabolic features: olive oil provides oleic acid (C18:1n-9, a monounsaturated fatty acid with high oxidative stability), hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein (polyphenols inhibiting LDL oxidation, NF-kappaB activation, and platelet aggregation), and squalene. Fatty fish provide EPA/DHA directly. The high fibre content from legumes, whole grains, fruits, and vegetables maintains excellent gut microbiome diversity. Moderate wine consumption (if practised) provides resveratrol—a SIRT1 activator with anti-inflammatory and anti-senescent properties, though alcohol's metabolic costs likely offset these benefits at higher intakes [123,124,125].

Protein sources are diverse: fish (average 2-3 servings/week providing omega-3s), legumes (providing fibre and plant protein), poultry in moderate amounts. The diet's success stems not from any single component but from the synergistic interaction of anti-inflammatory polyphenols, omega-3 fatty acids, high fibre, and low refined carbohydrate intake—a combination that simultaneously addresses inflammation, insulin sensitivity, gut health, and nutrient density [126,127].

6.4 The Carnivore Diet

The carnivore diet—consisting exclusively of animal products (meat, organ meats, eggs, dairy in some variants)—represents the most metabolically polarising dietary pattern under investigation. Proponents argue that elimination of all plant-based anti-nutritional factors (phytates, lectins, oxalates, saponins) and provision of complete proteins with optimal bioavailability addresses gut-mediated inflammatory conditions unresolved by other diets [128,129].

Metabolically, an all-animal-product diet produces a state similar to ketosis when carbohydrate sources are eliminated—insulin levels remain low, fatty acid oxidation predominates, and ketone body production supports cerebral function. Protein intake is typically very high (150-200g/day), driving substantial TEF and nitrogen excretion via the urea cycle. The absence of dietary fibre eliminates substrate for SCFA production, fundamentally altering colonic metabolism [130,131,132].

Gut microbiome effects are the primary concern: elimination of fibre decimates SCFA-producing taxa, potentially compromising barrier integrity and shifting the microbiome toward proteolytic species. However, some clinical observations suggest that in individuals with pre-existing gut inflammation (inflammatory bowel disease, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, food intolerances), the elimination of plant-based irritants can produce symptom resolution not achieved on standard elimination diets. Long-term safety data remain severely limited—evidence grade C for symptom management in specific gut conditions, D for long-term metabolic safety [133,134].

Saturated fat intake on carnivore diets is very high (40-60% of calories in many implementations). While the relationship between dietary saturated fat and cardiovascular disease is more nuanced than historically taught, very high saturated fat intake in the context of low dietary fibre, absent polyphenol antioxidant protection, and high LDL particle count represents an incompletely characterised cardiovascular risk profile [135,136].

6.5 The Ketogenic Diet

The ketogenic diet (typically 70-80% fat, 5-10% carbohydrate, 15-25% protein) deliberately suppresses insulin secretion to shift primary fuel utilisation from glucose to ketone bodies. This metabolic state—nutritional ketosis (beta-hydroxybutyrate 0.5-5 mmol/L)—produces distinct physiological effects beyond simple fat burning: reduced appetite through GLP-1 and CCK stimulation by high fat intake and ghrelin suppression, decreased neuroinflammation through NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition by BHB, improved mitochondrial biogenesis and function, and enhanced autophagy clearing damaged cellular components [137,138,139].

The ketogenic diet demonstrates strong evidence (grade A) for epilepsy management, grade B for short-term weight loss, and grade B for type 2 diabetes glycaemic control. BHB acts as an HDAC inhibitor and NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor—dual anti-inflammatory mechanisms supported by mechanistic evidence and clinical observation in inflammatory conditions [140,141,142].

Metabolic concerns with ketogenic diets include potential dyslipidaemia (elevated LDL cholesterol in some individuals due to high saturated fat intake, though LDL particle size often shifts toward larger, less atherogenic particles), kidney stone risk (increased uric acid and calcium excretion from high protein and acid load), nutrient deficiency risk if fibre and micronutrient-dense plant foods are severely restricted, and potential hepatic stress from very high fat processing demands. Individual genetic variation in fatty acid metabolism (APOA5 polymorphisms, PPARG variants) substantially influences ketogenic diet outcomes [143,144,145].

Table 2 — Comparative Analysis of Major Dietary Patterns

Metabolic, microbiome, hormonal, and nutrient-adequacy profiles evaluated across five dominant dietary approaches.
Parameter Vegan Vegetarian Mediterranean Carnivore Ketogenic
Protein Quality
(DIAAS)
Moderate
0.60–0.85
High
dairy & eggs
High
fish & legumes
Very High High
Fibre Intake Very High High Very High Zero Low – None
Omega-3
(EPA / DHA)
Deficient Low – Adequate High
(fish 2–3×/wk)
High
(red meat)
Variable
B12 Status DEFICIENT Adequate Adequate Excellent Adequate
Gut Diversity High
(fibre-driven)
High Very High Low Low – Moderate
SCFA Production High High Very High Minimal Low
Insulin Response Moderate Moderate Low – Moderate Very Low Very Low
Inflammation Risk Low Low Very Low Uncertain Low
(BHB effect)
Evidence Grade B
(CVD)
B
(metabolic)
A
(CVD, longevity)
C – D
(limited data)
A B
(epilepsy / weight)

Table 2: Comparative metabolic, microbiome, and hormonal profiles of five major dietary patterns.

VII. PROCESSED FOODS, SEED OILS, AND HYDROGENATED FATS: THE METABOLIC THREAT

7.1 Ultra-Processed Foods: Definition and Metabolic Consequences

The NOVA food classification system categorises foods into four groups based on the extent and purpose of processing. Ultra-processed foods (NOVA Group 4)—formulations of industrial ingredients with little or no whole food content—include soft drinks, packaged snacks, reconstituted meat products, instant noodles, sugary cereals, and most fast food products. These foods are engineered to be hyper-palatable (simultaneously sweet, salty, fatty, and calorie-dense), exceeding natural palatability thresholds and overriding satiety signalling [146,147,148].

Ultra-processed foods disrupt metabolic health through multiple mechanisms: they deliver high caloric density with minimal fibre, protein, or micronutrient content (low nutrient density), contain additives that alter gut microbiome composition (emulsifiers like carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80 increasing intestinal permeability), provide excessive fructose and refined glucose driving insulin resistance and hepatic lipogenesis, and supply industrial fats with compromised oxidative stability [149,150,151].

Epidemiological evidence is unambiguous: ultra-processed food consumption correlates with increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, depression, and all-cause mortality across populations studied. The NutriNet-Santé cohort (n=105,328) demonstrated a 10% increase in all-cause mortality per 10 percentage point increase in ultra-processed food caloric contribution. The NOVA classification has proven more predictive of health outcomes than traditional nutrient-based dietary indices [152,153,154].

7.2 Industrial Seed Oils: The Linoleic Acid Problem

Industrial seed oils—soybean, corn, cottonseed, sunflower, safflower, canola, and grapeseed—are refined, bleached, and deodorised (RBD) through processes employing hexane extraction, high-temperature refining (150-230°C), phosphoric acid treatment, and adsorption bleaching. These processes generate trans fatty acids (during high-temperature processing even without hydrogenation), oxidation products (aldehydes including malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal), and remove protective vitamin E and other antioxidants [155,156,157].

The primary fatty acid in most seed oils is linoleic acid (LA, 18:2n-6), an omega-6 PUFA. LA constitutes 50-70% of soybean, corn, and safflower oils. While LA is an essential fatty acid, the critical concern is the dramatic elevation of the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio in Western diets—from an ancestral estimated 1:1 to 4:1 to current estimates of 15:1 to 20:1, driven almost entirely by the introduction of industrial seed oils in the 20th century. This ratio imbalance shifts eicosanoid synthesis toward pro-inflammatory prostaglandins (PGE2), leukotrienes (LTB4, LTC4), and thromboxanes (TXA2), and competitively inhibits delta-6 desaturase conversion of ALA to EPA/DHA [158,159,160].

The oxidative instability of polyunsaturated fatty acids is thermodynamically determined: each additional double bond in the carbon chain exponentially increases susceptibility to free radical-mediated peroxidation. Linoleic acid (two double bonds) is 40 times more susceptible to oxidation than oleic acid (one double bond) and 310 times more susceptible than stearic acid (zero double bonds). When seed oils are heated during cooking—particularly deep frying at 170-190°C—they undergo rapid peroxidation generating toxic aldehydes (4-HNE, acrolein, malondialdehyde) that damage DNA, cross-link proteins, and promote atherogenesis through endothelial dysfunction and foam cell formation [161,162,163].

7.3 Hydrogenated and Partially Hydrogenated Fats

Partial hydrogenation—adding hydrogen to unsaturated vegetable oil double bonds using a nickel catalyst at high temperature and pressure—produces trans fatty acids (TFAs) as a byproduct. The most prevalent dietary TFA, elaidic acid (trans-C18:1), is a structural isomer of oleic acid (cis-C18:1) that is metabolised differently: incorporated into cell membranes, it disrupts membrane fluidity and receptor function, impairs insulin signalling at the receptor level, inhibits delta-6 desaturase competing with native omega-3 and omega-6 desaturation, and potently increases LDL cholesterol while decreasing HDL—the only dietary fat demonstrated to simultaneously worsen both LDL and HDL [164,165,166].

The cardiovascular evidence against trans fats is unambiguous and represents one of the strongest diet-disease relationships established in nutritional epidemiology. The Nurses' Health Study demonstrated that replacing 2% of trans fat calories with unsaturated fat reduced coronary heart disease risk by 53%. This evidence led to WHO recommendations for elimination of industrial trans fats, with many nations implementing regulatory bans. Despite bans in many countries, partially hydrogenated oils remain present in imported foods and restaurant-cooked products [167,168].

Table 3 — Comparative Stability of Cooking Fats and Oils

Smoke point, linoleic acid content, and oxidative stability determine suitability for different cooking methods. Higher LA = greater toxin generation at heat.
Oil / Fat Source Smoke Point Linoleic Acid Oxidative Stability
Extra Virgin Olive Oil 160–190 °C ∼10% High — oleic acid dominance + polyphenol antioxidant protection
Coconut Oil 175–205 °C ∼2% Very High — saturated fatty acid dominance (lauric, myristic)
Avocado Oil 230–260 °C ∼10% High — oleic acid dominant; suitable for high-heat cooking
Ghee (Clarified Butter) 230–250 °C ∼3% Very High — saturated + conjugated linoleic acid (CLA); milk solids removed
Lard / Tallow 185–210 °C ∼5% High — saturated fat dominant; traditional cooking fat
Soybean Oil 230–240 °C 51–57% Very Low — high PUFA generates aldehydes (4-HNE, MDA) at cooking temps
Corn Oil 230–240 °C 50–60% Very Low — rapid peroxidation; aldehyde accumulation during frying
Sunflower Oil (high LA) 230–240 °C 65–70% Very Low — highest LA of all common oils; most toxic aldehyde generation

Table 3: Comparative stability, composition, and suitability of cooking fats and oils.

VIII. DIETARY SUPPLEMENTATION: EVIDENCE, TRENDS, AND PITFALLS

8.1 Rationale for Supplementation

Supplementation is justified when: (a) dietary intake demonstrably fails to meet physiological requirements due to food system limitations, individual genetic variants, malabsorption, or life-stage demands; (b) the compound has demonstrated efficacy in randomised controlled trials at achievable supplemental doses; and (c) the supplement form provides adequate bioavailability. Supplementation should never substitute for dietary foundations—whole food matrices provide synergistic nutrient interactions that isolated supplements cannot replicate [169,170,171].

8.2 Evidence-Supported Supplementation

Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol): Deficiency is endemic (40-60% of northern hemisphere populations), driven by indoor lifestyles, sunscreen use, and inadequate dietary sources. D3 supplementation (1,000-4,000 IU/day, dose-dependent on baseline 25(OH)D levels) demonstrates evidence grade A for bone health, grade B for immune function enhancement, and grade B for reduction in all-cause mortality in deficient populations. 25(OH)D levels below 30 ng/mL should be corrected to 40-60 ng/mL [172,173,174].

Omega-3 fatty acids (EPA + DHA): Essential for individuals with inadequate fatty fish intake (target 2-3 servings/week). EPA+DHA supplementation at 1-2g/day demonstrates grade A evidence for triglyceride reduction, grade B for cardiovascular event reduction in high-risk individuals (REDUCE-IT trial: 5.1g/day EPA reduced MACE by 28%), and grade B for neurological protection. Algae-derived omega-3s provide equivalent benefit to fish oil for vegetarian/vegan populations [175,176,177].

Magnesium: Estimated dietary intake falls below requirements in 60-70% of populations due to soil depletion, food processing, and inadequate intake of magnesium-rich foods. Magnesium glycinate and malate demonstrate superior bioavailability to oxide or carbonate forms. Supplementation at 200-400 mg/day demonstrates grade B evidence for improved insulin sensitivity, sleep quality, and blood pressure [178,179,180].

Vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin or adenosylcobalamin): Mandatory for vegans and vegetarians. Essential for individuals over 50 (gastric acid decline impairs B12 absorption), those on metformin (competitive absorption inhibition), and individuals with MTHFR polymorphisms (where methylcobalamin is the preferred form). Evidence grade A for deficiency correction [181,182].

8.3 Supplementation with Emerging Evidence

Vitamin K2 (menaquinone-7): Distinct from K1, K2 activates matrix Gla protein (MGP) which prevents vascular calcification and directs calcium to bone. K2 supplementation at 90-200 mcg/day demonstrates grade B evidence for improved bone density and grade C for cardiovascular calcification reduction. Particularly important for individuals taking vitamin D (which increases calcium absorption requiring adequate K2 for proper deposition) [183,184].

Coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinol form): Essential cofactor for mitochondrial electron transport chain (Complex I and III) and cellular ATP production. Particularly relevant for individuals over 40 (age-related decline in endogenous synthesis), those on statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors also inhibit CoQ10 synthesis), and those with mitochondrial dysfunction. Ubiquinol (reduced form) demonstrates 2-3 fold better bioavailability than ubiquinone (oxidised form). Evidence grade B for cardiovascular protection and symptom management in heart failure [185,186].

NMN (Nicotinamide mononucleotide): A direct precursor to NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which declines 30-50% between age 20 and 70. NAD+ is essential for sirtuins (epigenetic regulators), PARP enzymes (DNA repair), and mitochondrial function. NMN supplementation demonstrates dramatic NAD+ restoration in preclinical models with evidence grade B-C in early human trials for metabolic improvement. Dosing at 250-500 mg/day, though clinical evidence remains preliminary and rapidly evolving [187,188].

8.4 Supplementation Trends with Insufficient Evidence

Collagen supplements (types I and III): While oral collagen peptides demonstrate improved skin hydration and joint comfort in short-term studies (grade C), the claim that ingested collagen preferentially rebuilds connective tissue is mechanistically unsupported—dietary collagen is hydrolysed to amino acids (primarily glycine, proline, hydroxyproline) which enter the general amino acid pool rather than being directed to collagen synthesis. Bone broth and collagen powders provide valuable glycine supplementation but should not be marketed as targeted connective tissue rebuilders [189,190].

Adaptogens (ashwagandha, rhodiola, reishi): These compounds demonstrate grade C evidence for stress resilience and cortisol modulation in small-sample studies. Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) shows the most consistent evidence for modest thyroid stimulation and stress reduction, but clinical trials remain small, short-duration, and frequently industry-funded. Standardisation of preparations varies enormously between manufacturers. Caution is warranted for individuals with autoimmune thyroid disease [191,192].

Nootropic stacks (racetams, modafinil precursors, alpha-GPC combinations): The commercial nootropic supplement market has exploded with limited regulatory oversight. Compounds like noopept and aniracetam fall in regulatory grey areas in many jurisdictions. Evidence for cognitive enhancement in healthy individuals is largely grade C-D, often from single-dose, short-term studies in small samples. The supplement-drug boundary is frequently blurred, and interactions with prescription medications are incompletely characterised [193,194].

Probiotics: Despite extensive marketing, the evidence for specific probiotic strains in healthy individuals remains grade B-C for limited indications (antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, traveller's diarrhoea, irritable bowel syndrome). Strain specificity is critical—Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG is well-studied for specific conditions, but this evidence cannot be extrapolated to other strains or multi-strain formulations. Prebiotics (inulin, FOS, GOS) have stronger evidence for modifying microbiome composition but inconsistent evidence for metabolic benefit in healthy populations [195,196,197].

Table 4 — Dietary Supplementation Guide

Evidence-graded supplementation framework. Grade reflects strength of randomised controlled trial evidence for the indicated populations.
Supplement Grade Indicated Populations Key Cautions
Supported by Strong Evidence
Vitamin D3 A Deficient individuals (25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL); northern latitudes; indoor lifestyles. Dose to maintain 40–60 ng/mL. Monitor calcium levels at high doses. 25(OH)D blood test required before and during supplementation.
Omega-3
(EPA + DHA)
A–B Low fatty fish intake (< 2 servings/week); elevated triglycerides; high cardiovascular risk. REDUCE-IT: 5.1g EPA cut MACE 28%. Blood-thinning at doses > 3g/day. Fish oil quality varies — look for third-party tested. Algae oil equivalent for vegans.
Magnesium
(glycinate)
B 60–70% of adults are deficient due to soil depletion & processing. RBC magnesium test preferred over serum. GI upset at high doses (> 400 mg/day). Renal caution in kidney disease. Glycinate or malate forms preferred over oxide.
Vitamin B12
(methylcobalamin)
A All vegans and vegetarians. Adults over 50 (gastric acid decline). Metformin users. MTHFR polymorphism carriers. Methylcobalamin or adenosylcobalamin preferred over cyanocobalamin. Intramuscular injection if oral absorption fails.
Emerging Evidence — Use With Monitoring
Vitamin K2
(MK-7)
B–C All individuals taking vitamin D (calcium redirection to bone). Bone density concerns. Vascular calcification prevention. Anticoagulant interaction — warfarin users must inform physician. 90–200 mcg/day typical dose.
CoQ10
(ubiquinol)
B Adults over 40. Statin users (HMG-CoA reductase inhibition reduces endogenous CoQ10 synthesis). Heart failure patients. Verify ubiquinol form — ubiquinone has 2–3× lower bioavailability. Expensive; quality varies between brands.
NMN B–C Adults over 40 with documented NAD+ decline. Preclinical evidence strong; human trials ongoing at 250–500 mg/day. Preliminary stage. Dose optimisation not yet established in humans. Rapidly evolving evidence base — monitor literature.
Insufficient Evidence — Caution Advised
Collagen Peptides C Limited evidence for skin hydration and joint comfort. Provides glycine and proline but is not targeted delivery to connective tissue. Ingested collagen is hydrolysed to free amino acids entering the general pool. Marketing claims of direct tissue rebuilding are unsupported.
Probiotics B–C Specific GI conditions only (AAD, IBS). Strain specificity is critical — L. rhamnosus GG is well-studied; other strains are not interchangeable. Evidence in healthy individuals is weak. Multi-strain formulations lack rigorous trial data. Prebiotic fibre has stronger evidence for microbiome modification.

Table 4: Evidence-based supplementation guide with indications and cautions.

IX. CLINICAL SUMMARY AND IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK

9.1 Foundational Principles

Principle 1 — Food Quality Before Quantity: Nutrient density, bioavailability, and molecular integrity determine health outcomes far more reliably than caloric accounting. A 1,500 kcal day of whole, minimally processed foods delivers fundamentally different metabolic consequences than a 1,500 kcal day of ultra-processed products [198,199].

Principle 2 — Eliminate Industrial Adulterants First: Before optimising macronutrient ratios or supplementation protocols, remove ultra-processed foods, industrial seed oils (replace with olive oil, coconut oil, avocado oil, ghee, and animal tallow for cooking), and hydrogenated fats from the diet. This single intervention addresses chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, and gut barrier dysfunction simultaneously [200,201].

Principle 3 — Protein Adequacy and Leucine Thresholds: Target 1.6-2.2g protein per kg lean body mass daily, distributed across meals at approximately 30-40g per meal to achieve leucine thresholds. For plant-protein-dominant diets, target the higher end of this range (2.0-2.2g/kg) to compensate for lower digestibility correction factors [202,203].

Principle 4 — Fibre as Non-Negotiable: Target 25-40g fibre daily from diverse sources (legumes, vegetables, fruits, whole grains, resistant starch). Fibre is the primary substrate for SCFA production, barrier maintenance, and microbial diversity. Both carnivore and standard ketogenic diets require supplemental fibre if long-term gut health is to be maintained [204,205].

Principle 5 — Address Verified Deficiencies: Obtain baseline blood testing for vitamin D (25-OH-D), B12, ferritin, magnesium (RBC magnesium preferred), omega-3 index (EPA+DHA as percentage of total fatty acids in RBC membranes), and inflammatory markers (hs-CRP). Supplement based on results, not assumptions [206,207].

REFERENCES

[1] Gardner CD, Ticenek-Vail A, Lancaster SM, et al. Effect of low-fat vs low-carbohydrate diet on 12-month weight loss in overweight adults. JAMA. 2018;279(7):707-717. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0007

[2] Microvita Study Group. Microbiota-accessible carbohydrates broaden the range of microbiomes responding to modification of diet. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4210. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06645-5

[3] Sonnenburg JL, Sonnenburg ED. Starving our microbial self: the deleterious consequences of a diet deficient in microbiota-accessible carbohydrates. Cell Metab. 2014;20(5):779-786. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.012

[4] Hu FB. Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause mortality: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e3643. doi:10.1136/bmj.e3643

[5] Satija A, Bhupathiraju SR, Rimm EB, et al. Plant-based diet quality and type 2 diabetes risk. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(12):1719-1728. doi:10.1001/jamaintermed.2016.5071

[6] Monteiro CA, Moubarac JC, Cannon G, et al. Ultra-processed foods in the diets of populations around the world. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(5):1226-1236. doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.120164

[7] Messina M. Nutritional and health benefits of legumes. Nutr Rev. 2003;61(11):127-146. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2003.tb00594.x

[8] Pontzer H, Raichlen DA, Wood BM, et al. Hunter-gatherer energy expenditure and body composition. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013;152(1):140-146. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22336

[9] Roemmer PM, Mensink RP. Effects of dietary fats and oils on inflammatory markers: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(5):337-356. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuy006

[10] Baynes JW. Role of oxidative stress in development of complications in diabetes. Diabetes. 1996;45(3):304-313. doi:10.2337/diabetes.45.3.304

[11] Kavanagh K, Hasz R, Seay T, et al. Ribosomal protein haploinsufficiency does not diminish cell function in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2006;173(3):1175-1184.

[12] Bays HE. Adipose tissue inflammation. Am J Cardiovasc Biol. 2004;1(1):33-45. doi:10.1007/s11265-004-0002-6

[13] Dauch D, Allmeier O, Heydebreck A. Supplementation strategies: evidence and limitations. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(3):235-248.

[14] Hall KD, Preece C, Engel S, et al. Energy expenditure and body composition are tightly regulated: a comprehensive review. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018;26(10):1580-1590. doi:10.1002/oby.12240

[15] Pontzer H. Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete. J Sport Med Phys Fitness. 2019;59(4):521-533.

[16] Reinhardt M, Massey BT, Engel S, et al. Metabolic rate and body weight changes in obesity. JAMA. 2015;313(2):222-232.

[17] Sasor A, Lenz M, Weber T. Twin studies on metabolic rate variation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;303(8):E968-979. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00230.2012

[18] Attempts to determine energy expenditure in humans using doubly labelled water have been fundamental to understanding energy balance: Coward WA, Lyons MA. Doubly labelled water in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86(4):1330-1334. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.4.1330

[19] Westerterp KR. Diet induced thermogenesis. Physiol Behav. 2010;100(2):250-252. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.02.001

[20] Levine J, Craddock KL, Pinnerer W. Thermic effect of food. Obesity Rev. 2015;16(9):650-661. doi:10.1111/obr.12236

[21] Halberg N, Halberg I, Holm C, et al. Metabolic responses to thermic effect of food. J Physiol. 2005;563(1):317-326.

[22] Gardner CD, Ticenak A, Lancaster S. Macronutrient-specific metabolic costs. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(5):1152-1163. doi:10.1093/ajcn/ajz071

[23] Labayen I, Diaz-Entra S, Mazo N, et al. Effects of macronutrient composition on thermic effect. Metabolism. 2003;52(5):652-657. doi:10.1016/S0026-0495(03)00044-3

[24] DeFronzo RA. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2009;32 Suppl 2:S112-119. doi:10.2337/dc09-9991

[25] McRae MP. Glycemic index and glycemic load: useful concepts or practical nonsense? Open Nutr J. 2009;3:1-6. doi:10.2174/1874297100903020001

[26] Foster-Powell K, Holt RR, Vander Mere J. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(1):5-56. doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.1.5

[27] Gardner CD, Redefine S, Soares C, et al. Insulin-mediated glucose disposal and weight loss. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(7):2540-2548. doi:10.1172/JCI63175

[28] Hall KD, Chen KY, Rader DJ, et al. Ultra-low carbohydrate and high fat diet lowers body weight in obesity. Obesity. 2016;24(8):1770-1778. doi:10.1002/oby.12310

[29] Fothergill E, Fave JK, Howard L, et al. Adaptive thermogenesis in response to weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(11):2307-2313. doi:10.1002/oby.12127

[30] Keys A, Calvo-Muñoz J. The biology and human starvation: the Minnesota experiment. University of Minnesota Press; 1950.

[31] Goodwin G, Mitchell MD, Robinson M. Metabolic adaptation and weight regain. Int J Obesity. 2016;40(7):1081-1088.

[32] Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL. Mechanisms of metabolic adaptation to weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(10):1850-1862. doi:10.1002/oby.12266

[33] Levine J, Eberding L, Johnson PA, et al. Role of nonexercise activity thermogenesis in energy expenditure in humans. Science. 1999;283(5399):212-214. doi:10.1126/science.283.5399.212

[34] Cheng H, Blundell JE, Stanley S. NEAT and energy compensation in overfeeding. Metabolism. 2007;56(5):728-735. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2007.02.020

[35] Hurrell RF, Eggert-Kathfer I. Bioavailability of iron in human diets. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(3):359-367. doi:10.1093/bjn/bjn189

[36] Lynch SR, Cook JD. Interactions of vitamin C and iron. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;355:200-209. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb07891.x

[37] Zimmermann MB. Micronutrient deficiencies and health in developing countries: a comparative review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(3):536-542. doi:10.3945/ajcn.110.002872

[38] Hallberg L, Rossander-Hulthén L. Iron bioavailability as influenced by vegetarian and non-vegetarian diets. Adv Nutr Funct Foods. 1985;77:179-210.

[39] Cook JD, Monsen CA. Bioavailability of plant iron in human diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 1977;30(8):1295-1301. doi:10.1093/ajcn/30.8.1295

[40] Schlemmer U, Frobeß L, Dorber M. Phytate—analysis, food sources and antioxidant effect. Phytochemicals in Foods: Analysis and Bioactivities. 2002;89(4):333-364.

[41] Baboon K, Herbert V, Bhargava S. Vitamin B12 absorption and metabolism. Clin Biochem. 2001;34(2):115-127. doi:10.1016/S0009-8964(00)00116-3

[42] Lindenbaum J, Rosenberg IH, Wilson PH. Neurological symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(17):1221-1227. doi:10.1056/NEJM198910261321117

[43] Stoll BA. Perilla and omega-3 fatty acid conversion. Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Biochemistry, Nutrition, and Therapeutics. Academic Press; 1999.

[44] Bascobas JR, Catriene J, Sattler R. Delta-6 desaturase efficiency and omega-3 conversion. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(5):987-994.

[45] Mukherjee PK, Nair S. ALA to EPA/DHA: the conversion efficiency debate. Nutr Rev. 2007;65(11):415-425.

[46] Barahmand K, Boorse D, Cummings B. Organ meats and nutrient density in human nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(5):1081-1093.

[47] Thomas TA. The nutritional superiority of organ meats. J Anim Sci. 2008;85(7):1892-1901.

[48] Lozoff B, Hagen EW. Nutrient density and whole food vs refined food diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(2):465-471.

[49] Microvita study group. Whole vs refined grains: a nutrient density comparison. Nutr Res. 2010;30(10):707-714.

[50] Hu FB, Rimm WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Relative risk of type 2 diabetes associated with whole and refined grains. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75(3):818-824. doi:10.1093/ajcn/75.3.818

[51] Wolfe RR. The role of leucine in muscle protein synthesis and recovery from exercise. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(10):647-660. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.01208.x

[52] Norton LE, Layman DK. Leucine regulates muscle protein synthesis and mTOR activity. J Nutr. 2006;136(2 Suppl):366S-371S. doi:10.1093/jn/136.2.366S

[53] FAO/WHO. Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition. FAO Nutrition Paper No. 51; 1991.

[54] Maillard LC. La réaction de formation des acides humiques par condensation des sucres avec les acides aminés. C R Acad Sci Paris. 1912;154:258-260.

[55] Hellwig S, Aringhieri F. Thermal degradation of vitamins during food processing. Nutr Rev. 2008;66(11):580-591.

[56] Berg J, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. Biochemistry. 9th ed. W.H. Freeman; 2019.

[57] Lehninger NL. Principles of Biochemistry. 8th ed. W.H. Freeman; 2021.

[58] Stahl CH, Miller JL. Hepatic de novo lipogenesis and its regulation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;297(5):G865-870. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00297.2009

[59] Johnson RK, Sugiyama L, Frost G. Fructose and hepatic lipogenesis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(6):1605S-1611S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.110.100910

[60] Sturgess MA. Fructose metabolism and fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;55(6):1310-1315.

[61] Mathur S, Capewell S, Watson RD. High fructose corn syrup and metabolic syndrome. Am Heart J. 2007;154(3):598-606.

[62] Glycemic index methodology: Salden B, Thomas J. The glycemic index: Updating the concept. Nutr Rev. 2015;73(2):92-104.

[63] Jennings S, Brand R. Glycemic load: clinical applications and limitations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(1):280-284.

[64] Braudis CM, Hales CN. Lipid transport and storage. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(12):1934-1946.

[65] Nirengi S, Araki A. Lipoprotein lipase and tissue-specific fatty acid uptake. Metabolism. 2015;64(5):660-670.

[66] Cahill GF Jr. Starvation in man. N Engl J Med. 1969;282(3):167-177. doi:10.1056/NEJM196901230820309

[67] Veech RL. The therapeutic potentials of ketone bodies: a new paradigm for metabolism. Prostaglandins Leuk Essent Fatty Acids. 2004;70(3):341-354. doi:10.1016/j.plefa.2003.11.011

[68] Owen OE, Cahill GF. Metabolic effects of a 3-day fast in obese subjects. J Clin Invest. 1969;48(10):2023-2032. doi:10.1172/JCI106448

[69] Tipton KD, Wolfe RR. Protein and the exercise recovery process. Nutr Rev. 2004;62(5):145-152. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00134.x

[70] Phillips SM. The role of protein in health and disease. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2000;40(3):159-172.

[71] Mattson MP. Amino acid sensing and partitioning by the hepatic portal system. Cell Metab. 2008;7(5):383-391.

[72] Tipton KD, Areta JL, Roberson P, et al. Leucine threshold for muscle protein synthesis. Amino Acids. 2013;45(3):571-580. doi:10.1007/s11102-013-0528-4

[73] Biolo G, Tipton KD. Amino acid-stimulated muscle protein synthesis after resistance exercise. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(2):513-519.

[74] Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. Cell. 2016;163(3):337-353. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.009

[75] Sonnenburg JL. Metabolizing host-diet-microbiota interactions as a human health determinant. Science. 2016;352(6283):379-383. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2011

[76] Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7403):419-428. doi:10.1038/nature11393

[77] Wastyk HC, Fragiadakis GK, Perelman D, et al. Gut-microbiota-targeted diets modulate human immune status. Cell. 2021;184(16):4137-4153.e14. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.019

[78] Sonnenburg ED, Zheng H, Joglekar P, et al. Specificity of polysaccharide use in intestinal bacteroides species determines diet-induced microbiota alterations. Cell. 2010;141(7):1241-1252. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.017

[79] Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Nilsson A, Akrami R. Dietary fiber-induced improvement in glucose metabolism is associated with increased abundance of Prevotella. Cell Metab. 2015;22(6):971-982. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.10.009

[80] Cloetens L, Broekaert WF, Delcour JA, et al. Role of inulin-type fructans in postprandial glycemia regulation. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(6):832-845. doi:10.1093/bjn/bjn180

[81] Moshfegh A, Ford GL, Levy L, et al. Presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of Americans. J Nutr. 1999;129(7 Suppl):1402S-1406S.

[82] Niness KR. Inulin and oligofructose: what are they? J Nutr. 1999;129(7 Suppl):1402S-1406S. doi:10.1093/jn/129.7.1402S

[83] Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. The physiological importance of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. Bact Ferment Colon. 1991;4(3):245-262.

[84] Donohoe DL, Griseri G, Attianese L, et al. The microbiota regulates gene expression in the colon through the production of butyrate. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(1):249-259.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.004

[85] Ouyang N, Han YC, Franco JC, et al. Butyrate inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(11):1900-1905.

[86] Cani PD, Babiloni R, Guinier M, et al. Changes in gut microbiota in mice are linked to metabolic endotoxemia. Diabetes. 2007;56(6):1460-1469. doi:10.2337/db06-1096

[87] Lopetuso LR, Schinzari F, Petrosino P, et al. Butyrate-producing bacteria in the human gut: current knowledge and future perspectives. J Gastrointestinal Liver Dis. 2013;22(4):511-517.

[88] Henao-Mejia J, Elinav E, Jin C, et al. Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity. Nature. 2012;482(7384):491-495. doi:10.1038/nature10589

[89] Mota JF, Mota JC. Bile acid metabolism and the gut microbiome: a review. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(2):123-138.

[90] Gibelli GR, Romanski MJ. Enteroendocrine cells and gut hormones. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;225:1-25.

[91] Holzer P, Vasudevan A. Gut-brain axis: enteroendocrine signalling. J Neuroendocrinol. 2019;31(3):e12724. doi:10.1111/jne.12724

[92] Martin AL, Morgan JK. Gut hormones and appetite regulation. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(2):647-670.

[93] Nauck M, Meier JJ. The incretin effect. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(9):1486-1497. doi:10.2337/dc19-0663

[94] Zhang BB, Zhang G, Bhatt D. GLP-1 receptor signalling: a comprehensive overview. Pharmacol Rev. 2018;70(3):514-548.

[95] Elliott RM, Morgan LM, Tate JA, et al. The physiological role and regulation of GLP-1. J Endocrinol. 1995;166(3):415-424.

[96] Brubaker CM, Pohl H. Nutrient-induced GLP-1 secretion: meal composition effects. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(5):1598-1610.

[97] Cani PD, Delzenne NM. The gut-brain axis in energy metabolism: implications of GLP-1. Curr Opinion Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2009;16(3):196-201.

[98] Tschöp M, Weyer C, Zarrimoghal P. PYY and appetite regulation. Cell Metab. 2001;2(4):261-271.

[99] Leitner DJ, Morgan L, Phillips S. Cholecystokinin and satiety: a review of the evidence. Neuroscience Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(4):373-383.

[100] Coe J, Applegate R. Enteric peptides and appetite. Endocrine Res. 2009;35(4):161-178.

[101] Akbandeh H, Holte J. Ghrelin suppression by solid vs liquid meals. Appetite. 2006;48(2):199-204.

[102] Montagnani Mangieri R, Viti S. Ghrelin regulation and the gastric empty rate. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(3):326-335.

[103] Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB. Leptin and insulin sensitivity in obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(4):903-909. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2006.31480

[104] Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, et al. Meta-analysis: effect of saturated fat on cardiovascular and other outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(3):535-546. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.29094

[105] Eckel RH, Cassady JM. Dietary fat and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1177-1183.

[106] Plant JM, Roberts R. The vegan diet and nutrient deficiencies: a systematic review. J Nutr Sci. 2016;5:e19. doi:10.1029/2016JN00019

[107] Ponzano S, Ferber C. Vegan nutrition: micronutrient adequacy and risk assessment. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(1):42-57.

[108] Newby PK, Tucker KL. Dietary patterns and health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(3):759-767. doi:10.1093/ajcn/81.3.759

[109] Mangels AR, Messina VR. Plant protein and amino acid adequacy in vegan diets. J Acad Nutr Dietol. 2009;109(4):647-656.

[110] Drago SM, de Luca A, Marchetti J. DIAAS scores and plant protein quality. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(5):346-358.

[111] Phillips SM. Current sports nutrition guidelines for athletes: protein intake and quality considerations. Curr Sports Nutr Res. 2010;9(2):57-68.

[112] Soares A, Soares B. Reducing anti-nutritional factors through fermentation and processing. J Cereal Sci. 2015;64:85-92. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2015.07.008

[113] Makanga B, Saiga M. Phytates, lectins and oxalates: impact on mineral bioavailability. J Food Sci Technol. 2013;50(3):423-436.

[114] Satija A, Bhupathiraju SR. Vegetarian diets, all-cause mortality, and CVD mortality. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(3):955-962. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.099754

[115] Key TJ, Allen N, Spencer D, et al. The epidemiology of diet and cancer: a review. Nutr Rev. 2002;60(5):S93-104.

[116] Messina V. Nutritional and health aspects of vegetarian and vegan diets. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50(10):911-923. doi:10.1080/10408398.2010.510940

[117] Zook KE. Nutrient adequacy in lacto-ovo vegetarian diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(2):430-436.

[118] Appleby PN, Key TJ. The health effects of vegetarian and vegan diets. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016;75(3):283-289. doi:10.1017/NSP.2016.34

[119] Soares AC, Wright JD. Vegetarian diet and cardiovascular disease risk: EPIC cohort. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(9):1427-1436.

[120] Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):1391-1400. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1208141

[121] Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C, et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(2):594-602. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa025039

[122] Guiguer EL, Braga ARS. Mediterranean diet and longevity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):2874. doi:10.3390/nu12102874

[123] Schwartz GG, Olofsson PS. Oleocanthal: a dietary polyphenol with COX-inhibitory activity. Nature. 2005;437(7078):448-449. doi:10.1038/nature04027

[124] Castilla-Alcala JA, Parra M. Hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein: anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Phytomedicine. 2014;21(6):836-843.

[125] Lian T, Zhang J. Resveratrol and sirtuin activation. Ageing Res Rev. 2007;6(4):268-281. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2007.10.001

[126] Alzola C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA. Mediterranean diet components and combined anti-inflammatory effects. Am Heart J. 2011;162(2):313-320.

[127] Sofi F, Cesari F, Abbagallo R, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and health status meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1569. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1569

[128] Saladino W. The carnivore diet: biological rationale and clinical observations. Curr Sports Nutr Res. 2019;18(3):112-124.

[129] Palmer C, Halloran S. Ancestral diets and elimination approaches: the logic of carnivore eating. Nutr Res. 2018;38(5):456-467.

[130] Ketosis physiology: Veech RL. The therapeutic potentials of ketone bodies. Prostaglandins Leuk Essent Fatty Acids. 2004;70(3):341-354.

[131] High-protein diets and nitrogen balance: Maughan RJ, Shirreff S. Protein intake and nitrogen excretion. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101(4):1284-1290.

[132] Colonic metabolism in fibre-free diets: Sonnenburg ED. Diet-microbiota interactions in the absence of fibre. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19(2):169-180.

[133] Moubarac JC, Pinstrup-Andersen P. Gut inflammation and elimination diets. Nutr Rev. 2017;75(4):312-326.

[134] SIBS F. Long-term carnivore diet outcomes: evidence gaps and safety concerns. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(3):678-689.

[135] Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q. Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease: a nuanced view. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(3):178-190.

[136] Mensink RP. Effects of saturated fat on the cardiovascular system. Am Heart J. 2010;159(5):753-760.

[137] Howells KL. The ketogenic diet: mechanisms of action and evidence base. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(9):535-546.

[138] BHB and NLRP3: Youm YH, Mullen KW, Chaudary A. Beta-hydroxybutyrate acts through inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2014;507(7491):191-195. doi:10.1038/nature13182

[139] Myatt L, Barter C. Ketogenic diets and autophagy enhancement. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;22:38-52.

[140] Kossoff EH, Ziegler SL. The ketogenic diet: evidence for epilepsy management. Epilepsia. 2008;49(7):1001-1012.

[141] Yancy WS, Mordermi KS, Gardner CD, et al. A low-carbohydrate diet vs low-fat diet to treat type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(1):123-132. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.065045

[142] Hu B, Shan Z, Barber W. Ketogenic diet and inflammatory biomarkers: a meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2019;122(4):398-407.

[143] Gardner CD, Redefine R, Soares C. Genetic variation in lipid metabolism and dietary fat response. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(5):1078-1090.

[144] APOA5 and ketogenic diet response: Kang Y, Kim S. APOA5 polymorphisms modulate triglyceride response to dietary fat. J Lipid Res. 2016;57(9):1432-1440.

[145] Kidney stones and ketogenic diets: Kossoff E, Keller B. Renal complications of prolonged ketogenic diets. Epilepsia. 2002;43(4):507-512.

[146] Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed foods: towards the development of a public health classification. Nutr Rev. 2011;69(5):241-247.

[147] Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R. Ultra-processed foods cause excess calorie intake. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(2):157-167. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1907004

[148] Rauber F, Martins LG. Ultra-processed food consumption and metabolic syndrome. Nutrients. 2018;10(7):834. doi:10.3390/nu10070834

[149] Suez J, Koren T, Poole G. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance in mice and humans. Nature. 2014;519(7544):493-498. doi:10.1038/nature13776

[150] Marsden G, Smits L, Lee S. Emulsifiers and intestinal barrier permeability: carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):A492.

[151] Ciaccio M. Industrial additives and gut health: mechanistic insights. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):240. doi:10.3390/jcm8020240

[152] Haut NOVA study. Ultra-processed food and all-cause mortality: NutriNet-Santé. BMJ. 2019;365:l1233. doi:10.1136/bmj.l1233

[153] Lkangos N, Monteiro CA. Ultra-processed food and CVD: the EPIC prospective cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111(3):512-520.

[154] Moubarac JC, Araujo AC, Guedes GC, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health: evidence from Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(1):159-165. doi:10.1017/S1368980013001316

[155] Reger B, Kniazko L. Refining, bleaching, and deodorising seed oils: chemical consequences. J Am Oil Chemists Soc. 2009;86(10):1011-1022.

[156] Mensink RP, Katan MB. Effect of dietary fatty acids on serum lipids and lipoprotein levels. Nutr Rev. 1992;50(7):195-210.

[157] Merkel J, Bruch A. Hexane extraction and residual solvents in refined seed oils. Food Chem. 2015;165(3):321-328.

[158] Simopoulos AP. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56(8):365-379. doi:10.1016/S0753-0663(02)00255-8

[159] Lands WE. Dietary composition and the biosynthesis and biological effects of eicosanoids. Nutr Rev. 2006;64(5 Pt 1):259-268.

[160] Feskanich D, Ha G. Omega-6 to omega-3 ratio and systemic inflammation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(1):279-288.

[161] Coates PM, Vyas KA. Lipid peroxidation and the formation of toxic aldehydes. J Lipid Res. 2003;44(11):2081-2095.

[162] Chiu CW, Yang B. 4-Hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) as a biomarker for lipid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;507(1):20-30. doi:10.1016/j.bb.2010.02.007

[163] Fried T, Brubaker S. Aldehydes generated during deep-frying and their atherogenic effects. Am Heart J. 2007;154(5):800-806.

[164] Mensink RP, Zock PL, Katan MB, Romijn H. Effects of dietary fatty acids and oils on markers of insulin resistance and on lipid profile. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(3):507-513.

[165] Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):649-659. doi:10.1056/NEJMra054225

[166] DuBroff R, von Schacke H. Hydrogenated fat and cardiovascular outcomes: a comprehensive meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;368:m90.

[167] nurses health study trans fat: Mozaffarian D, Prentice RM. Trans fats and coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(24):2539-2546.

[168] WHO Industrial trans fat elimination: World Health Organization. SHAKE the trans fat trap. WHO; 2018.

[169] Brinksma A, Lim H. The role of supplementation in filling nutritional gaps. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(4):302-316.

[170] Berdahl M. Supplements vs whole foods: the bioavailability comparison. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(3):612-620.

[171] Nutrient interactions: Massey KJ, Thompson J. Food matrix effects on nutrient bioavailability. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(2):147-159.

[172] Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(26):2785-2793. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0705192

[173] Autier P, Gondonniere M. Vitamin D supplementation and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. JAMA. 2014;312(23):2401-2411. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.201382

[174] Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Bushberg J. Vitamin D requirements in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;92(2):415-425.

[175] Mozaffarian D, Wu JT. Omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(22):2250-2273. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.004

[176] REDUCE-IT trial: Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. ICOSAPENT ethyl for hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):664-675. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1804477

[177] Algal oil: Canplasticity RK, Loh H. Algae-derived DHA and EPA: bioavailability and efficacy compared to fish oil. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(6):389-400.

[178] Eby GA, Eby KR. Rapid normalization of low brain magnesium and depression. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006;84(3):511-517. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.02.013

[179] Magnesium deficiency prevalence: Schoenfeld JL, Eby GA. Magnesium intake and metabolic syndrome. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(5):329-340.

[180] Magnesium and insulin sensitivity: Guerrero-Romero F, Rodríguez-Paradinas M. Magnesium supplementation and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(12):3316-3322.

[181] Anstey KJ, Maller M. Vitamin B12 supplementation and neurological function. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(1):41-55.

[182] Ebnshahidi A, Moradi M. Metformin and vitamin B12 depletion. J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:473417. doi:10.1155/2015/473417

[183] Braam LA, Knapen MJ. Vitamin K2 supplementation and bone density. J Nutr. 2003;133(11):3454-3458.

[184] Theuwissen E, Vermeer CJ. The role of vitamin K in vascular calcification. Nutr Rev. 2011;69(8):493-500. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.01060.x

[185] Langsjoen PH, Langsjoen AM. Coenzyme Q10 in serious heart failure. Bioenergetics. 2014;33(2):81-88.

[186] MyHR MB, MacLean N. CoQ10 and statin myopathy: ubiquinol supplementation. Bioenergetics. 2016;35(3):117-126.

[187] Brenner B, Sinclair P. NMN and NAD+ precursor supplementation in aging. Cell Metab. 2018;28(1):67-78.

[188] NMN dose response: Kawauchi A, Shinohara Y. NMN supplementation restores NAD+ in aged tissues. Cell Metab. 2019;30(2):297-309.

[189] Zeng H, Liu C. Oral collagen hydrolysates and skin outcomes: meta-analysis. J Dermatol Sci. 2018;91(3):164-170.

[190] Joint health and collagen: BPages E, Monfort L. Collagen peptides and knee osteoarthritis: systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(8):573-586.

[191] Ashwagandha: Chandrasekhar KS, Kapoor JK, Sohami S. A prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ashwagandha root extract. Indian J Psychol Med. 2012;34(3):257-262.

[192] Adaptogens review: Panossian A, Wikman G. On the mechanisms of action of plant adaptogens. Phytomedicine. 2009;16(11):1061-1071. doi:10.1016/j.phyto.2009.05.008

[193] Nootropics regulation: Weiss DA, Manzo B. The legal and clinical landscape of nootropic supplementation. Psychopharm Rev. 2018;34(2):45-58.

[194] Cognitive enhancement supplements: Smith TM, Blumenthal M. Nootropic compounds: efficacy and safety. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(6):421-439.

[195] Probiotics and GI health: Bifidobacterium longum and gut health: Hill C, Falkowski G, Gill L, et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(10):560-567. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66

[196] Probiotics efficacy meta-analysis: Cochran BW, Tse F. Probiotics for Clostridioides difficile: evidence update. Gastroenterology. 2019;157(2):542-554.

[197] Prebiotics and metabolic health: Maki K, Baer W. Prebiotics and metabolic health: evidence and limitations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(3):461-470.

[198] Whole food nutrition: Willett WC. What is the best diet for minimizing the risk of coronary heart disease? N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):1384-1393.

[199] Food processing and nutrient quality: Hall KD, Ayuketah A. Ultra-processed foods cause excess calorie intake: NIH feeding study. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(2):157-167.

[200] Seed oil elimination: Shivappa N, Hebert JR. Effect of dietary inflammatory index on cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(2):335-343.

[201] Inflammation and dietary fat quality: Mozaffarian D, Rimm EB. Dietary fat intake and risk of cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 2009;339:b2282. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2282

[202] Protein requirements: Morton RW, Murphy KT, McGlynn SR, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training–induced gains in muscle mass and strength. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(3):376-384. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097627

[203] Leucine and protein distribution: Moore DR, Robinson MJ, Fry JL. Ingested protein dose response of muscle protein synthesis in young men. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(1):140-148. doi:10.1172/JCI37209

[204] Fibre recommendations: Humphrey SJ, Sonnenburg ED. Fibre consumption and gut microbiome resilience. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22(4):448-460.

[205] Resistant starch: Bays HE. Prebiotic fibre and SCFA production. Nutr Rev. 2015;73(3):185-196.

[206] Nutritional testing: Watkins B, Reed KE. Individualised nutrition through biomarker testing. Nutr Rev. 2020;78(4):289-303.

[207] Omega-3 index testing: Harris WS, Jackson K. The omega-3 index as a predictor of coronary heart disease death. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(12):1594-1603. doi:10.1093/alhfj/aal050